I've been in a real sour mood lately... partly due to the heat and partly because mothering seems to be more demanding than I'm up to at the moment. Lately all I long for is some ME TIME. I just want some time to relax, kick my feet up, or go out and have fun. Anything that doesn't involve chasing Oliver around or washing dishes.
Unfortunately, the reason that I have almost no "me time" looks to be very likely related to the model of parenting I've taken to heart--
attachment parenting. I complained (or rather whined) about my lack of "me time" to my solution-oriented husband, who, told me to --guess what--think of some sort of solution. Among his suggestions, teach Oliver to drink by himself from a bottle. Lovely time-saving idea, but that would mean feeding him formula which goes against my conviction to breastfeed for at least a year for the medical benefits. I could pump milk for him to feed himself, but it would entail buying an expensive breast pump or spending even
more time manually pumping it out. Another of his ideas was to tell Oliver firmly not to cry when he cries. Well, that goes against another of my baby-raising convicitons of responding to your baby's needs in order to build a relationship of trust that will hopefully make him a secure individual. Finally, he offered to take Oliver on a morning stroll to give me a bit of desperately sought after "me time." (If you're wondering... Jaime works mostly in the evening doing wedding photography.) Now, that's an idea I like.
Just now after re-reading the 8 ideals of attachment parenting on their API website,
maintaining balance in your family life in order to avoid parent burn-out happens to be on the list. They do offer some ideas that you can read for yourself at the above link, but none of them are what you could call an easy solution. Their last so-called-solution is to keep in mind that babies are most needy in the early
years and that "this too shall pass."
My response is .... in the
early years?? YEARS?? Yikes! It looks as if this parenting thing is gonna mean very little "me time" for quite some time. Now I can very clearly understand why my mother used to get so grouchy when we would come looking for her while she was locked away in the bedroom watching TV on her own.
And then last night I did some blog reading on other moms' blogs and came across a post called
Mom Guilt that got me thinking even more. I don't know a lot about this mom, except that she has a three year old in a Montessori program and works what she calls part-time because she takes off Fridays to be with her kids. To sum up her post, she's feeling guilty for not staying at home full time with her kids because she believes that they deserve to be cared for by someone who loves them unconditionally--something the kids' teachers can't do. But at the same time she's afraid that if she were home full-time she would be a cranky, impatient, and exasperated mother. Other moms commented similar feelings of guilt for working and putting their kids in daycare, yet at the same time said they would feel crabby or unfulfilled if they stayed home. One mom even wrote that her husband's co-workers (men) strongly disagree with women working. "They claim we're letting someone else raise our kids."
I feel that this work but feel guilty vs. stay-at-home but feel unfulfilled is a critical issue for modern mothers. But what was it like for our grandmothers? No one was urging them to enter the workforce (except maybe during WWII when they were needed to manufacture the planes and weapons of war), yet did they also grapple with feelings of unfullfilment and crabbiness at staying home all day with the kids? I never got that feeling from my grandma (mom's side), who exemplifies the stoic Mennonite woman. On the other hand, I totally get that feeling from my dad's mother. I think that if given the charm and talent, she would have opted to have been a famous singer rather than a mother. Unfortunately for her and my dad, she was born into a time that gave women few options.
I'm still trying to figure out my own views on this issue, but I'm curious to hear what other readers out there think and feel about the working vs. staying at home dilemma. For now, I'm sticking with my plan to stay home for at least a year with Oliver because I am hoping that he will become a secure adult knowing that his mom was there to meet his needs as a baby. After he turns a year old, I have to figure out what my next move is. Ideally, I'd like to have my mom look after him so I can have some time of my own or possibly work part-time. But if we're not in Kansas (we may possibly move there), I think I will put him in some sort of classes for babies a few times a week. Something interesting for him that gives me a little time too.